I'm looking for the best ending in terms of morality. I want to say it's the link the fire ending, except the time frame that this takes new souls game takes place in is far beyond where the first souls game was. Only dust and ash is left, nobody else is alive. The only solution to get the age of man is what you do in the best ending of DS3. From Kaathe, "Your ancestor claimed the Dark Soul, and waited for Fire to subside. Where is it confirmed that Dark Souls 2 takes place after Dark Souls 1? Npc's invade your world, you can summon npc's to help you, and in one instance, you can even invade the world of an npc. Link the fire again or set the world to darkness? There are two possible ending for Dark Souls: "To Link the Fire" and "The Dark Lord". Regardless- the age of fire is over. As for the timeframe this is from the wikipedia page: While little has been revealed of the game's story, the game's director has been cited as mentioning that the sequel is linked to its predecessor, but with no specifications as to how. :p. How does interaction with others in multiplayer fit in to the timelines? There are two possible ending for Dark Souls: "To Link the Fire" and "The Dark Lord". The ending doesn't matter because "The flames will eventually fade and only dark will remain" either way. What confuses me though is the argument of some to asume "both endings happened". We don't really know how long that would take, especially since the Primordial Serpents are the ones who want it to happen and they operate on a completely different time scale since they're immortal. For Dark Souls II on the PlayStation 3, a GameFAQs message board topic titled "Which DS1 ending is canon? Unless someone can correct me and point out the exact point in Dark Souls where I should completely give up on trying to explain anything with logic. It doesn't matter if you light the fire or not. I believe our working time frame is 1000+ years. Triggered by defeating Gwyn, Lord of Cinder, then leaving the boss arena without lighting the final bonfire. I think that means that Linking the Flame is the canon vanilla ending. Most people from what I've read tend to agree that the linking of the fire ending is the "canon ending" for Dark Souls 2. well get down to ash lake...thats nature and thats how the world was supposed to be. The Chosen Undead may choose to perpetuate the Age of Fire, or instead bring about the Age of Dark. DARK SOULS™ III. There are two possible ending for Dark Souls: "To Link the Fire" and "The Dark Lord". These are popularly referred to as "the Fire ending" and "the Dark ending". IHazCandy4You 6 years ago #2. on the other hand,dark soul came from the first flame,with the flame fading,the humankind will lost the abillity to rule,its just an "AGE OF SERPENTS".they just bow for you and sneer behind you for your foolishness. The events of Dark Souls 1 are considered legend in Dark Souls 2. I'm speculating the link the fire might be more fitting. However, the tricky part is figuring out which ending for 2 would be the "canon" ending, at least for me. The age of fire will come back, even if you chose not to kindle the fire. These are popularly referred to as "the Fire ending" and "the Dark ending". I help out someone else to kill O&S but then when I get there, O&S still exist. The director mentioned that the concept of time factored into the story and also that "if the first game was set in the North Pole, this one would be in the South Pole; that sort of contrast. I don't know if I'm explaining myself here. and secondly, its supposedly at least a century after Dark Souls, so it seems the flame has subsided, thus ushering in the Age of Dark. I'm fairly sure that whichever ending is canon, Dark Souls 2 is in the Age of Darkness. After defeating Gwyn, I just walked out to see where the knights have gone, but i unknowingly triggered the second ending lol. After the player slays Nashandra (or Aldia, if his conditions are met), a cutscene will play showing the player walking atop the golems, who create a bridge for the player to cross, and into a throne room. Cookies help us deliver our Services. There is no canon ending for dark souls other than the fire is linked in ds 1&2. Contributions to Fextralife Wikis are licensed under a. Maybe the chosen undead didn't complete either path. some of the in game text says on some items that they dont even know how old they are due to lack of knowledge. If the BotC simply rekindled the First Flame again, cool. This is why humanity is now in the form of a "human effigy" which is handled directly by the undead. the shackles are being bound to a bonfire. Many people say usurpation is canon though. My best speculation is that bonfires before they were tied to the first flame were strictly places of refuge for the undead - and that is likely the purpose they will serve again. If instead it's just crossing over to different periods of time, then how do you explain bosses getting revived to be fought again? Apparently darksouls 2 is a sequel to darksouls 1 and not a prequel like I had thought. By sacrificing himself to link the Fire, and commanding his children to shepherd the humans, Gwyn has blurred your past, to prevent the birth of the Dark Lord. I think it's important to carefully examine how the creators of Dark Souls used that particular deus ex machina before you try to use it as a catch-all. obviously Pharis. What Gwyn did was connect all the bonfires to the first flame - they had to exist in some capacity beforehand. The dark lord ending puts you, the chosen undead, in the possibility to be the new dark lord and bring upon the world the age of men, but that was, to my understanding, instantaneous. So a new world without cycles will be born. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Link the Fire makes the most sense at first glance since the bonfires still seem to be functioning quite well, but this isn't taking into account how long the bonfires actually take to die out if the Link the Fire ending isn't canon. It makes you work for it. The chosen undead either linked the flames and then another person refused to make the sacrifice, or they rejected it, and the world faded into dark ever since. If you are looking for a quick overview of the game's walkthrough , follow our recommended Game Progress Route. It was used pretty much exclusively to explain out-of-place historical figures and pretty much never for events except in the case of the Artorias of the Abyss content, in which case YOU are the out of place historical figure. If this is our time frame, then both endings can be canonical. Read at your own risk. ", New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Ds3 hasn't had a continuation in the form of a sequel and therefore can't have a canon ending. i dont hate gwyn for stuff he did to people i hate him because he started the cycle...dragons were neutral but gwyn and the other lords greed the damn greed...the world would have been a better place the way it was.i believe some of kaathe words are bullsh!t like he says gwyn has resisted NATURE but this sh!tty cycle isnt nature, its the most unnatural thing i ever saw.

Baking With Pistachio Butter, Suzuki Hayabusa 2019, 10 Advantages Of Marketing, Kale And Spinach Salad With Strawberries, How To Find Electron Proton And Neutron, Carbon Disulfide Toxicity, Spanish Worksheets For Beginners With Answers Pdf, On Earth We're Briefly Gorgeous Trauma, Moong Dal Malayalam Meaning, Big Nerd Ranch Location,