Yeah I would go with the Audix i5. Hi Stu, I’ve had both SM57 and i5 Mics. Crispness and clarity. The reason for this is that when Audix came out with the microphone, Audix was essentially going straight for the throat of the Shure SM57's market. With driven sounds, I found the Shure to be fizzy and almost always felt the need to EQ the guitar tracks during tracking. Mic shootout: Audix i5 vs. Shure SM57; Are you a heavy metal guitar player, collector or enthusiast? Before we get into the Audix i5 vs. SM57 comparison, grab a snack, sit back and relax because.. Today I will outline the Audix i5 and then compare it with the SM57 towards the end. Picks up all the subtle details. Could be better than the SM57 on guitar cabinets and bass. The mic for guitar amps and snare drums. I have several i5's and a couple of SM57's. Both of these mics are slightly different. Stu is determined to help you make sound decisions, and strives to deliver the best and most in depth content on the internet! So yeah it’s said to be even more durable than the SM57. The low end of the i5 is punchier than the 57. I lean toward the i5's, they just sound better on a recording to me (JMHO). Now without further ado, let’s get rolling!! The i5 has a more forgiving proximity effect than the SM57. Did I miss the mark on something? The i5 is more natural sounding and less compressed than the SM57. Don’t put the mic too close to your amp, or you won’t get the right sound and it will become too punchy. Another endorsement for the i5. Mogami cables are recommended with the i5. The i5 has a larger target area, and thus is easier to get a good take quickly. And I've only used the I5 a few times just to get a feel for it. When I got the Audix i5, I had to try it out against the SM57. Required fields are marked *, “As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.”, “Stu is determined to help you make sound decisions, and strives to deliver the best and most in depth content on the internet! Used that ever since my A/B home test. window.dojoRequire(["mojo/signup-forms/Loader"], function(L) { L.start({"baseUrl":"mc.us19.list-manage.com","uuid":"0573ad2c5093a15ee16bc49c5","lid":"f49b0eb597","uniqueMethods":true}) }). It’s not as likely to crack with the hit of an accidental flailing drumstick (not the chicken kind). The Audix i5 is a microphone that is becoming more and more popular among the internet's audio gear forum lurkers. The SM57 sounds slightly muddier and boxier than the i5. I eventually read about a guy who went into Guitar Center to pick up an SM57. The i5 is said to be richer and fuller in the mid-range than the SM57. In theory the I5 is better, but I've never used an SM57 to make that comparison myself. The price of this microphone is quite similar to that of the sm57. It’s a good compliment to the SM57 when miking an amp especially. Both are dynamic microphones that excel in many of the same situations – especially for guitar cabinets and snare drums. Audix i5. Thanks for stopping by! The head of the i5 is not quite as delicate as the 57. Requests? My choice was to buy both. The 57 is still a great mic no doubt, but the i5 outshines it just a bit. The I5 is the second one in the example. The tone with snare is more mid-range heavy and dense than the Sm57. It was obviously preferable (for my application) over the Shure. The video really sold me and exposed the SM57 a little bit, especially that whole boxiness factor which you can really get a sense of. Registration is free and easy. The mic must be directly in front of your mouth for best sound. The salesman ended up telling him to go with the i5, going as far as to actually buy it back from the guy if he didn’t like it better than the Sm57. Captures the Marshall DSL40C amp with ease, and especially good with the low mids and detailed highs. After all, the57 has been around since about 1965. I like both for different reasons and on different drums. Questions? In his spare time, he likes to fish, paint, play guitar, pray, rap, make beats, take photos, record videos, graphic design, and more. One of the complaints with the 57 is of mic placement; it has to be near perfect, with a lot of experimentation. Final Word. Your email address will not be published. SM57 vs Audix I5 into Sapphire Pro 40 / FLAC / Acoustic Guitar. At it’s best with snares and guitar cabinets. Nice man! I did find the i5 more open, airy and richer in sound. Hope this helps make up your mind :) I think the SM57 is more natural sounding, but the I5 does have more edge/bite so it's probably useful on distorted guitars or snares. Your email address will not be published. If so, we hope you will register now and join our community! Versatile. SM57 is more common, so should yours break, you're more likely to get a quick replacement on shorter notice. The i5 has a higher dB output with a slight boost at 150Hz. Just sold SM57 to a friend. To put it bluntly, nearly everything I’ve read says go for the i5 over the 57. TJ. It is made from a cast zinc-alloy case with a mounted XLR output. Amazing on snares and guitar cabinets. An extremely versatile mic with a phenomenal crispness and clarity. This baby needs a good preamp and interface or mixer. The low end of the i5 is punchier than the 57. Used for micing guitar amps and acoustic bluegrass mandolin. In his spare time, he likes to fish, paint, play guitar, pray, rap, make beats, take photos, record videos, graphic design, and more. Preamp vs. Interface. SEE THE AUDIX i5 FOR YOURSELF ON AMAZON!! His sense of humour, coupled with a knack for excellence and strict attention to detail are what allow him to stand out in a crowded industry.”, Topping E30/L30 vs. iFi Zen CAN Signature 6XX, Tonor TC-777 USB Condenser Microphone Review & Shootout, FiiO BTR3K vs. BTR5 vs. DragonFly Red [Which Is Best For YOU?!].
Health And Beauty Blog Name Ideas,
Chef Mickey's Desserts,
How To Find Arithmetic Mean,
Strawberry Yogurt Fruit Dip Cool Whip,
Chord Progression Rules Pdf,
Tony Moly Face Mask Pack,
F1 Simulator Game,